MedicAir Elected Best Air Purification MedTech Company 2022

MedicAir Elected Best Air Purification MedTech Company 2022

Your mini basket

There are no products in your basket.

MedicAir Elected Best Air Purification MedTech Company 2022

MedicAir Elected Best Air Purification MedTech Company 2022

dots
Article Technology

Using Computational Fluid Dynamics to Evaluate the Role of Air Purification in Reducing Fallow Time in Dentistry

The Problem
Waiting for air borne particles to disperse safely costs the dental industry time and money
In dentistry, fallow time is a period which allows for airborne pathogens to settle out of the air and mitigate the risk of airborne infection transmission to dental professionals and staff. The current recommendation is a one-hour period.
Client
download
Number of units
0
Date of installation
2021-05-03
Location
1525 McCarthy Blvd #1200, Milpitas, CA 95035, United States
dots-casestudy
The Solution
Computer software was created to show how an air purifier would help reduce waiting times in dental practices
Using a computational fluid dynamics software, we created a virtual dental surgery and simulated a ten-minute aerosol generating procedure. We then modelled air flow in the room with no ventilation, and then in the same room with an air purifier at a throughput of 430m3 h-1, and subsequently in the room with one open window providing 6 ACH and no purifier. The particles released were monitored and their behaviour and airborne time measured and collated.
product-image-3
Screenshot-2023-06-01-at-15.52.28
dots-casestudy
The Result
"Our findings suggest that the use of an air purifier greatly reduces the total particle volume in the air and could greatly reduce the risk of infection transmission in a dental surgery."
The results of our simulations evidence that, based on this study, there is a drastic reduction in the time taken to clear 99.9% of air borne particles from the air, when compared to the open window model. The room with no ventilation had a total particle number at 600s of 4.5 million, which required 8400s to reduce by 99%. With an open window providing 6 ACH, we obtained a value of 2500s for a 99% reduction in airborne particles, and a similar peak particle volume. Conversely, when using an air purifier throughout the procedure, the peak particle number was ten times lower than the peak number without ventilation or with an open window, and after the particle injection 99% airborne particle reduction was achieved in 60s. Our findings suggest that the use of an air purifier greatly reduces the total particle volume in the air during the aerosol generating procedure, as well as the fallow period needed. The values found with 6 ACH and an open window are corroborated in other literature, which provides some validation to our testing modality. The use of air purification could greatly reduce the risk of infection transmission in a dental surgery."